Strategi Pembejalaran Era Kekinian : Mewujudkan Peserta Didik Berkarakter, Kritis, dan Kreatif

17

Prof. Dr H. Mashudi, M.Pd
mashudi@uinkhas.ac.id
Guru Besar Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Naskah :
Diterima : 15 November 2023
Direvisi : 23 Desember 2023
Disetujui : 25 Desember 2023

Abstraksi

Tulisan ini membahas strategi pembelajaran yang relevan dengan era kekinian dalam rangka mewujudkan peserta didik berkarakter, kritis, dan kreatif. Artikel ini menyelidiki beragam pendekatan pembelajaran yang berfokus pada pengembangan aspek-aspek tersebut. Dengan menganalisis metode-metode inovatif dan implementasi teknologi, artikel ini memberikan pandangan holistik tentang bagaimana institusi pendidikan dapat mencapai tujuan tersebut. Peran penting yang dimainkan teknologi dalam pendidikan memberi guru kesempatan merancang pengalaman belajar bermakna. Bagi guru, ini bukan bidang baru; guru selalu mempertimbangkan alat dan sumber daya yang paling dapat mendukung kegiatan belajar bagi peserta didik. Namun, kemajuan dan aksesibilitas teknologi telah membuat kemungkinan-kemungkinan yang muncul. Peran dan keahlian guru sangat penting karena guru berada di garis depan dalam merancang dan memberikan pengalaman belajar.

Referensi

Aggarwal, A. K., & Bento, R. (2000). Web-based education. In A. K. Aggarwal (Ed.) Web based learning and teaching technologies: Opportunities and challenges (pp. 2–16). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

Astutia, Waluyab, Asikin. (2019). Strategi Pembelajaran dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding Universitas Semarang. ISSN (2686-6404).

Ataizi, M., & Donmez, M. (2014). Book Review: 21st Century Skills -Learning for Life in Our Times. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(3), 272–274.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M. & Arici, A. (2009). Why educators should care about games. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 76–80.

Bilotta, Eleonora, Francesca Bertacchini, Lorella Gabriele, Simona Giglio, Pietro Salvatore Pantano, Tullio Romita. (2021). “Industry 4.0 technologies in tourism education: Nurturing students to think with technology”, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29, November

Bloom, B.S. (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. Yearbook: National Society for the Study of Education, 92(2), 1–8.

Calp, M. Hanefi dan Resul Bütüner, “Society 5.0: Effective technology for a smart society” dalam Aboul Ella Hassanien, Jyotir Moy Chatterjee dan Vishal Jain (eds), Artificial Intelligence and Industry 4.0, Academic Press, 2002, 175-194

Frey, B., & Birnbaum, D. (2002). Learners’ perceptions on the value of Power-Point in lecture. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED467192)

Fukuda. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0, International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 220 (February)

Elias G. Carayannis dan Joanna Morawska-Jancelewicz, (2022) “The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as Driving Forces of Future Universities”, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Vol 13, hal. 3445–3471

Gaytan, J. A., & Slate, J. R. (2002). Multimedia and the college of business: A literature review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 186–205.

Ghiffar, Muhammad Alfarizqi Nizamuddin., Nurisma, Eliza., Kurniasih, Cucu., dan Bhakti, Caraka Putra. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Crtical Thinking Skills untuk Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional STKIP Andi Matappa Pangkep 1 (1).

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (2001). Instructional media and technologies for learning (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Karakaya, F., Ainscough, L., & Chopoorian, J. (2001). The effects of class size and learning styles on student performance in a multimedia-based marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(2), 84–90.

K. Debevec, M. Shih, V. Kashyap Learning strategies and performance in a technology-integrated classroom. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38 (2006), pp. 293-307.

Lambert, N., & McCombs, B. L. (1998). How students learn. Washington, DC: American Psychological Assocation.
Lase, Delipiter. 2019. Pendidikan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Sudermann.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2003), 125–139.

Meghna M Nair, Amit Kumar Tyagi, dan N Sreenath, (2021) “The Future with Industry 4.0 at the Core of Society 5.0: Open Issues, Future Opportunities and Challenges”, 2021 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI)

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–85.
Önday, Ö. (2020). Society 5.0-Its Historical Logic and Its Structural Development. Journal of Scientific Reports, 2(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3731954

Scott, C. L. (2015). The Futures of Learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? Education Research and Foresight, 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2015.08.005.

Sevima, Fadhol. (2021). Apa Perbedaan Blended learning dan Hybrid Learning?. https://sevima.com/apa-perbedaan-blended-learning-dan-hybrid-learning/

Smith, S. M., & Woody, P. C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220–227.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Full-Text. (N.D.). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92784-6

Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005

Young, R. A., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(3), 373–388. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.005

PDF Page:  1-12

Terbit: Juni 2024